[License-discuss] FreeAndFair license
John Cowan
cowan at ccil.org
Wed Jun 21 20:32:54 UTC 2017
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
The author in your hypothetical is not actually violating his/her own
> licence, because he/she already had statutory rights to the work's
> copyright-covered rights, and didn't need a licence to get them.
>
Indeed; I should have put "violate" in scare quotes. This is no
hypothetical, though; it is the term rewriting language Pure <
https://agraef.github.io/pure-lang>, which I recommend to anyone interested
in dynamically typed languages that use pattern matching (and lack
constructor discipline a la Haskell).
--
John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
In the sciences, we are now uniquely privileged to sit side by side
with the giants on whose shoulders we stand. --Gerald Holton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20170621/fc8df42e/attachment.html>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list