[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0

[Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)]

I've passed your question along, I'll answer as soon as I know.

Thanks,
Cem Karan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-bounces at opensource.org] On Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H.
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:16 PM
> To: license-discuss at opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0
> 
> All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links
> contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web browser.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> 
> Awesome.  You may wish to ask your tech transfer office if any of your army UARCs care about apache vs ECL v2.  The patent grants are
> slightly different and ECL v2 is geared toward the odd needs of research universities.  I'm guessing not because very few projects actually
> use ECL v2.  On the other hand DoD OSS projects are somewhat special cases themselves and UARCs have to deal with a variety of
> research grant sources and are typically smaller pieces of the larger university system.
> 
> 
> On 7/28/16, 4:38 PM, "License-discuss on behalf of Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)" <license-discuss-
> bounces at opensource.org on behalf of cem.f.karan.civ at mail.mil> wrote:
> 
> >I am working with ARL Legal counsel on the license continuously.  There
> >are times when I'm slow in answering messages on this list because I
> >have to run down to their office and get their opinions.  I've been
> >working with our Tech Transfer folks to make sure they are onboard with
> >the proposed policy.  I believe (but I'll double check) that our legal
> >counsel is talking up the chain of command as well, so that should be
> >taken care of as well.  Thank you for pointing that out!
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Cem Karan
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: License-discuss
> >>[Caution-mailto:license-discuss-bounces at opensource.org]
> >>On Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H.
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 2:50 PM
> >> To: license-discuss at opensource.org
> >> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re: [License-discuss] U.S. Army Research
> >>Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0
> >>
> >> All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please
> >>verify the identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all
> >>links  contained within the message prior to copying and pasting the
> >>address to a Web browser.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >>
> >> Has this been reviewed by the ARL Office of Chief Counsel?  I know
> >>the army has an intellectual property counsel as part of the
> >>JAG/USALSA out at Ft. Belvoir.
> >>
> >>
> >> You also have a tech transfer office at ARL that handles Patent
> >>License Agreements for ARL under 15 USC 3710a who would probably  want
> >>to have input on any ARL open source agreement that includes patent
> >>grants.
> >>
> >> There are likely a lot of regulations and policy (DoD and Army) you
> >>need to be aware of before attempting to submit an ARL branded open
> >>source license.  ARL may or may not be able to do so without
> >>permission from RDECOMŠwho may elect to punt the issue up to JALS-IP
> >>as  the IP issue you are trying to solve does not appear to be trivial
> >>and is a USG/DoD/Army wide issue.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> License-discuss mailing list
> >> License-discuss at opensource.org
> >>
> >>Caution-Caution-https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
> >>license-dis
> >>cuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> Caution-https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5559 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160729/613f393d/attachment.p7s>