[License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: US Army Research Laboratory Open Source License proposal

[Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)]

OK at this point I want to start another discussion about the license 
(attached once again, with the minor correction of stripping out the word 
'Apache', which I'd left in earlier).  Is the license compatible with Apache 
2.0 and the licenses that Apache 2.0 is compatible with?  If not, why not?

We really want our code to be maximally useful, which requires that others be 
able to use it freely.  If the language in the license precludes that, then it 
should change.

Thanks,
Cem Karan
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: License.txt
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160725/ba590e43/attachment.txt>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5559 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20160725/ba590e43/attachment.p7s>