[License-discuss] Companies that encourage license violations
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Fri Sep 18 20:01:00 UTC 2015
Pamela Chestek scripsit:
> Without entering into that quagmire [...] my use of the word "contract"
> was simply inapt. The principle applies in the interpretation of all
> types legal documents.
Sure. But if it is not meaningless, what does it mean? Since the right
of an owner to revoke a bare license is inherent, it must be a promise
not to exercise that right, and on what meeting of the minds, what
consideration is that promise founded? Looks like a nudum pactum to me.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Is it not written, "That which is written, is written"?
More information about the License-discuss