[License-discuss] Source code distribution for web application dual licensed under GNU GPL Affero Public License? [closed]

[David Woolley]

On 16/09/15 22:34, Kevin Fleming wrote:
> The statement 'dual licensed' is illogical here, as only only license is
> named (AGPLv3)

In fact, the upstream has made such a mess of the license file, that the 
OP really needs to contact them directly, to clarify the licence terms 
and make sure that they had actually understood the licensing on any 
third party code they used.

If they had actually complied with the licence, the LICENSE file would 
have contained the actual legal text of the Affero licence.