[License-discuss] Source code distribution for web application dual licensed under GNU GPL Affero Public License? [closed]
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Thu Sep 17 20:24:28 UTC 2015
On 16/09/15 22:34, Kevin Fleming wrote:
> The statement 'dual licensed' is illogical here, as only only license is
> named (AGPLv3)
In fact, the upstream has made such a mess of the license file, that the
OP really needs to contact them directly, to clarify the licence terms
and make sure that they had actually understood the licensing on any
third party code they used.
If they had actually complied with the licence, the LICENSE file would
have contained the actual legal text of the Affero licence.
More information about the License-discuss