[License-discuss] Copyright holders evolution with MIT license
Aurélien Thierry
aurelien.thierry at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 07:54:41 UTC 2015
Thank you for the answer, I'll list them this way!
Aurélien
2015-06-09 18:03 GMT+02:00 Johnny A. Solbu <johnny at solbu.net>:
> On Tuesday 9. June 2015 17.15, Aurélien Thierry wrote:
> > What should it be in the new release ? Should it include the previous
> > statement as follows:
> > "Copyright (c) 2015 Company2
> > Copyright (c) 2014 Company1"
> > ?
>
> My suggestion would be to list the companies with the oldest entry first.
> I would do this:
> Copyright (c) 2014 Company1
> Copyright (c) 2015 Company2
>
> That is what we do when translating .po files.
>
> --
> Johnny A. Solbu
> web site, http://www.solbu.net
> PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
>
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20150610/e417bc4e/attachment.html>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list