[License-discuss] Copyright holders evolution with MIT license

[Johnny A. Solbu]

On Tuesday 9. June 2015 17.15, Aurélien Thierry wrote:
> What should it be in the new release ? Should it include the previous
> statement as follows:
> "Copyright (c) 2015 Company2
> Copyright (c) 2014 Company1"
> ?

My suggestion would be to list the companies with the oldest entry first.
I would do this:
Copyright (c) 2014 Company1
Copyright (c) 2015 Company2

That is what we do when translating .po files.

-- 
Johnny A. Solbu
web site,   http://www.solbu.net
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20150609/48245453/attachment.sig>