[License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts?

[Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz]

Free / open source software like freedom, not like "free beer" :-)
No FOSS license prohibits making some money out of all the work done...
P-E


2014-06-10 7:51 GMT+02:00 ChanMaxthon <xcvista at me.com>:

> I believe it is perfectly fine. RMS himself even *encourage* that.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Jun 10, 2014, at 13:11, ldr ldr <stackoverflowuser95 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Here is an excerpt from the response I received:
> >
> > "Yes, FullContentRSS is an AGPL3 script, you can use and/or modify the
> > script as you want. However you can get the script for $20."
> >
> > Is that congruent with the AGPL3 license?
> > _______________________________________________
> > License-discuss mailing list
> > License-discuss at opensource.org
> > http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
>



-- 
Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
pe.schmitz at googlemail.com
tel. + 32 478 50 40 65
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20140610/117e3cbe/attachment.html>