[License-discuss] Open Source Eventually License Development
rick at linuxmafia.com
Fri Aug 16 00:05:23 UTC 2013
Quoting fred trotter (fred.trotter at gmail.com):
> The mandate for this list is "facilitate constructive discussion of open
> source licensing and further the goals of the OSI."
> Your argument is that this list only exists to determine whether a given
> license meets the definition of Open Source, and then only discuss it if it
> meets that definition. You are ignoring the "further the goals" part of the
> purpose of this list.
As a point of clarification, evaulation of licences proposed for OSI
Certified status got moved to separate mailing list license-review when
that forum was established a couple of years back. This forum has been
allowed to be more free-form.
> I am asking this mailing list for help crafting a proprietary license. It
> is certainly ironic but not at all off-topic.
Speaking for myself (and I am only a friendly hanger-on to OSI), I have
no problem with you asking. However, I doubt OSI has relevant expertise,
and would not be surprised if OSI Board members both have other
priorities and are wary of involvement in proprietary software licensing.
Cheers, "I love stateless systems."
Rick Moen "Don't they have drawbacks?"
rick at linuxmafia.com "Don't what have drawbacks?"
McQ! (4x80) -- Sam Hughes
More information about the License-discuss