[License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]
lrosen at rosenlaw.com
Mon Nov 12 19:06:36 UTC 2012
Count my vote as NO for the same reason that Nigel gave.
Count me also as frustrated that OSI continues to silence the arguments
against your license categorizations!
Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com)
3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at mercury.ccil.org]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 10:40 AM
To: license-discuss at opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize
the OSI licensing page [revisited]
Tzeng, Nigel H. scripsit:
> Frankly, if you aren't going to tackle the categorization issue then
> I'd just update the links to insure they are accurate and leave it
> alone because you're going to have contention over what belongs in
> that list of "popular, widely used or have strong communities" on the
> revised landing page.
Okay, you're against the change; the rest is off-topic for this thread.
BALIN FUNDINUL UZBAD KHAZADDUMU cowan at ccil.org
BALIN SON OF FUNDIN LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss at opensource.org
More information about the License-discuss