[License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited]

[Lawrence Rosen]

Count my vote as NO for the same reason that Nigel gave. 

Count me also as frustrated that OSI continues to silence the arguments
against your license categorizations!

/Larry

Lawrence Rosen
Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com)
3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482
Office: 707-485-1242


-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at mercury.ccil.org] 
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 10:40 AM
To: license-discuss at opensource.org
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize
the OSI licensing page [revisited]

Tzeng, Nigel H. scripsit:

> Frankly, if you aren't going to tackle the categorization issue then 
> I'd just update the links to insure they are accurate and leave it 
> alone because you're going to have contention over what belongs in 
> that list of "popular, widely used or have strong communities" on the 
> revised landing page.

Okay, you're against the change; the rest is off-topic for this thread.

-- 
BALIN FUNDINUL          UZBAD KHAZADDUMU        cowan at ccil.org
BALIN SON OF FUNDIN     LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss at opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss