[License-discuss] license committee

Bruce Perens bruce at perens.com
Fri Mar 9 18:43:43 UTC 2012


On 03/09/2012 09:49 AM, John Cowan wrote:
> Fonts are not documents.  What's meant is that the license doesn't apply
> to a document created using the font.
Obviously that is what is meant. But what it says is arguably different 
from what is meant. A professional would never have made such a silly 
mistake. And the point is that OSI can't even bring itself to 
dis-approve the "crayon" licenses.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120309/ae143221/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120309/ae143221/attachment.p7s>


More information about the License-discuss mailing list