Searching for a licence

Bani borboleta at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 04:06:12 UTC 2011


The "Simple Public License" is very far from what you described here.
I recommend the MIT - http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license
You probably shouldn't need to modify it.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Shaun Wilde <shaun_wilde at hotmail.com>wrote:

>  Hi
>
> I am looking for an appropriate licence to use with my Open Source project
> which says something along the lines of
>
> "Feel free to use this code in any way you like, just don't hold me or any
> contributers accountable if it all goes
> pear-shaped; oh and by the way you haven't paid for it, if you have more
> fool you, so don't expect support."
>
> Is there an appropriate licence on the opensource site or should I pick one
> - like the simple public licence and modify it?
>
> I just didn't want to create yet another licence variant
>
> Regards
>
> Shaun
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20110317/8dd3a430/attachment.html>


More information about the License-discuss mailing list