GPL and closed source

[Mahesh T. Pai]

Dale said on Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:12:41PM +0300,:

 >    *>It would be better to use a licence that reflects the intended
 >    redistribution terms.
 >    what kind of license for that pupose do you suggest ? For example do BSD
 >    or Artistic* allow linking against a closed source binary without the
 >    restrcitions posed by the GPL?
 > 

Dale, I guess you may be better off discussing this with a
lawyer. This list is not the best place to answer questions of the
type "which type of license suits me?"


-- 
Mahesh T. Pai   ||
Sent from my Computer. Running Debian GNU/Linux
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20110606/92e1aaba/attachment.sig>