Which DUAL Licence should I choose.

[Rod Dixon]

I understand the desire to be helpful to the OP, but I think it is OK - if not preferable -  to say to someone that we cannot help you on this list given your stated objective and the purpose of this list. 

Rod



Sent from my iPhone 

On Aug 5, 2011, at 4:30 PM, jonathon <jonathon.blake at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 08/01/2011 04:09 PM, Tzeng, Nigel H. wrote:
>> My recommendation is to use the Creative Commons Attribution,
> Non-Commercial, Share Alike 3.0 license.
> 
> You have got to be kidding.
> 
> There are no points in common between the requirements that that license
> imposes, and the criteria that the OP listed.
> 
> It doesn't even meet the "pay me a royalty if you sell it" criteria that
> the OP wants. (It is possible to sell CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 licensed content,
> and be in full compliance of that license.)
> 
> jonathon
> -- 
> All emails sent to this with email address with a precedence other than
> bulk, or list, are forwarded to Dave Null, unread.
> 
>    * English - detected
>    * English
> 
>    * English
> 
> <javascript:void(0);>
>