Alexander Terekhov on the Jacobsen case
ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com
Fri Aug 15 14:16:19 UTC 2008
Our good friend Alexander Terekhov wanted to weight in with you all on
the latest federal court ruling. Since we couldn't agree on ground
rules for his re-admission to the list, I agreed to post a pointer to
his comment (in a response to an ACT Online blog post):
Anyone who wishes the discuss the matter with him is encouraged to
email him directly, or reply in the comments there (if Noah Clements
-- Ernie P.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Alexander Terekhov" <alexander.terekhov at gmail.com>
> Date: August 15, 2008 4:50:12 AM PDT
> To: "Ernest Prabhakar" <ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Russ Nelson" <nelson at crynwr.com>
> Subject: Re: In honor of this august event
>> However, if you wish to create a blog post somewhere with your
>> views on the
>> CAFC, I'll be happy to post the URL to license-discuss so those
>> seeking the
>> thrill of disagreement can follow up with you on their own.
> Here it is:
> I mean my comment.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-discuss