Alexander Terekhov on the Jacobsen case

[Ernest Prabhakar]

Hi all,

Our good friend Alexander Terekhov wanted to weight in with you all on  
the latest federal court ruling.  Since we couldn't agree on ground  
rules for his re-admission to the list, I agreed to post a pointer to  
his comment (in a response to an ACT Online blog post):

> http://blog.actonline.org/2008/08/federal-circuit.html


Anyone who wishes the discuss the matter with him is encouraged to  
email him directly, or reply in the comments there (if Noah Clements  
doesn't mind).

-- Ernie P.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Alexander Terekhov" <alexander.terekhov at gmail.com>
> Date: August 15, 2008 4:50:12 AM PDT
> To: "Ernest Prabhakar" <ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Russ Nelson" <nelson at crynwr.com>
> Subject: Re: In honor of this august event
>
>> However, if you wish to create a blog post somewhere with your  
>> views on the
>> CAFC, I'll be happy to post the URL to license-discuss so those  
>> seeking the
>> thrill of disagreement can follow up with you on their own.
>
> Here it is:
>
> http://blog.actonline.org/2008/08/federal-circuit.html
>
> I mean my comment.
>
> regards,
> alexander.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20080815/83f59475/attachment.html>