Fwd: Implications for switching licenses mid-stream
cinly.ooi at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 14:56:07 UTC 2008
[Thanks to Chris for reminding me that reply button does not work correctly
to reply to list]
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chris Zumbrunn <chris at czv.com>
Date: 24 Apr 2008 13:36
Subject: Re: Implications for switching licenses mid-stream
To: cooi at iee.org
On Apr 24, 2008, at 14:03 , Cinly Ooi wrote:
On 24/04/2008, Chris Zumbrunn <chris at czv.com> wrote:
> > In this context, the "absence of a tort" means that the project leader
> > isn't causing injury to the contributor. If you read more into it than that,
> > then I believe we do indeed disagree.
> > In the absense of injury, the contributor has no grounds to sue. But the
> > project leader would be on thin ice.
> In practice, this means damaging relationship with the contributor.
> It might also be contrary to ethics.
Yes, I agree.
Btw, so is killing and eating animals or enslaving them to drink their milk
Cinly, assuming you wanted your message to go to the list, you'll have to
resend it, because you only sent it to me. Unfortunately the license-discuss
list doesn't automatically set the Reply-To headers appropriately.
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the License-discuss