a plea

[Matthew Flaschen]

Scott Shattuck wrote:
> I agree that discussions regarding specifics are inevitable given the
> culture in question. The point I was trying, however poorly, to put
> forth was the need to structure the mailing list(s) so that there is at
> least one list that is focused purely on the actionable events.
> 
> Perhaps that's this list, perhaps it's license-actions at opensource.org
> (to be created)

I think this is a good idea.  People comments submit semi-formal
comments there, like "I believe license X is fully compliant with the
OSD" or "License X should not be approved because it violates OSD #3 and
#5", or "License X does not violate OSD #3", with brief supporting
comments.  Then, further discussion could take place on license-discuss.

Matt Flaschen