For Approval: The Simplified BSD License

[David Woolley]

John Cowan wrote:

> Of all the reasons for objecting to a license, qualms about its name
> seems to me the least constructive.
> 

It is a reason for changing the name, not for objecting to the actual 
content.  I note that naming has also been raised as an issue for the 
Microsoft Permissive Licence.

I suspect the name is outside of the immutable text in this case.

-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.