rms at 1407.org claiming "licenses aren't contracts" and that...
Alexander Terekhov
alexander.terekhov at gmail.com
Fri Oct 19 19:29:30 UTC 2007
On 10/19/07, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> Quoting Matthew Flaschen (matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu):
>
> > This is ridiculous. The list is not for general copyright law
> > discussions, nor for general license discussions, nor for general
> > contract discussions. It exists so that licenses submitted to OSI can
> > be discussed before approval. There are obviously occasional
> > discussions unrelated that topic, but they should be kept to a minimum.
>
> Mr. Terekhov knows this, but finds the fact inconvenient. See also:
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/lexicon.html#tactical-stupidity
To some extent it's rather unfair game on my part to respond to Mr.
Moen given his killfile filter (publicly known part), but I still
defer to Mr. Bernstein : http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
and once again recommend:
http://cr.yp.to/conferences/russia.html
:-)
regards,
alexander.
--
"To show the falsity of 'PJ''s claims, in most cases I need look no further
than Groklaw itself. 'PJ' wants more journalists to use the site as a
resource, so I'll do just that. Below are excerpts from my story that 'PJ'
says are incorrect, followed by 'PJ''s characterization of them, and my
response -- at times taken directly from Groklaw."
-- http://tinyurl.com/2mn3jc
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list