For Approval: Common Precertification Development and Distribution License
Chuck Swiger
chuck at codefab.com
Wed Mar 7 19:25:29 UTC 2007
On Mar 7, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Marc Whipple wrote:
> We would like to propose a new Open Source license called the
> Common Precertification Development and Distribution License
> ("CPDDL") for certification. It is based on the Common Development
> and Distribution License ("CDDL") of which Sun Microsystems is the
> license steward.
[ ... ]
> In order to provide incentives for such development either by
> commercial entities or by the employees of such entities with their
> approval and consent, the CPDDL provides that commercial usage
> rights for software developed under its terms are limited to active
> contributors during the development process and for a limited time
> thereafter.
Thanks for the submission, and I hope we can provide feedback which
will help you obtain your goals while still using an Open Source
license, but restricting commercial reuse is a non-starter. See OSD
#1, #5, & #6; your CPDDL clause 2.1e violates them:
> ? (e) The license granted under this Section shall not allow any
> Commercial
> Use of the Original Software, or portions thereof, other than by a
> Contributor who has submitted at least one (1) Modification which has
> been accepted by an authorized Source Code Library Monitor. Any
> Contributor who has submitted at least one (1) Modification which has
> been accepted by an authorized Source Code Library Monitor may use the
> Original Software, or portions thereof, in Commercial Use subject
> to the
> other terms of this License.
If the software is open source, it must permit people to use, change,
and modify the software for both commercial and non-commercial purposes.
[ ... ]
> To our knowledge, such a combination of temporary restriction and
> license-term shifting has not been incorporated into an Open Source
> license before. We are aware that this is a departure from
> customary Open Source licensing techniques, and we ask that you
> consider our goals and our attempt to attain them while maintaining
> the spirit of Open Source in a highly regulated, highly competitive
> environment with open minds. We are prepared to defend our aim, but
> we are also prepared to accept comment, criticism, and sincere
> attempts to improve our method of achieving it. We welcome, and
> would be grateful for, your input.
I proposed such a license back in 2003:
http://www.pkix.net/~chuck/Licenses/ENRL.html
...and the OSI board's feedback was that this is not an Open-Source
license as it stands, but would become OSD-compliant after the
restriction period had expired. I believe the same would apply to
the CPDDL.
--
-Chuck
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list