License Committee Report for July 2007
forums at david-woolley.me.uk
Tue Jul 31 20:03:20 UTC 2007
Michael Poole wrote:
> forward than I was when I read Timothy McIntyre's email. The changes
> in GPLv3 seem deep enough that over-analogy with GPLv2 could obscure
> important changes, which is the major reason I did not and do not feel
> comfortable enumerating the changes.
You need to find someone who is capable of doing so, as you will not be
able to champion the licence through the approvals process unless you
understand it inside out. (There is also a preference that the person
submitting be able to change it in response to feedback, but I think
these licences are immutable.)
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
More information about the License-discuss