delite me from your mailing list
christian_maletz at yahoo.de
Wed Jan 24 21:34:49 UTC 2007
Rick Moen schrieb:
> Quoting Ross Mayfield (ross.mayfield at socialtext.com):
>> Socialtext has been monitoring the conversation and we appreciate your
> You're quite welcome.
> I've recently noticed a significant and relevant factual error on your
> "Socialtext Open Source Wiki" licensing pages:
> The wiki front page is http://www.socialtext.net/stoss/ , which includes
> this text:
> Socialtext Public License
> All Socialtext Open Source projects are released under the Socialtext
> Public License (MPL 1.1with an addendum, please see the Why the
> Appendix page [link]).
> Following that hyperlink takes one to
> http://www.socialtext.net/stoss/index.cgi?why_the_appendix, which starts
> out like this:
> Why the Appendix
> Socialtext's Open Source (SPL) license contains two additonal Appendix
> not found in the original MPL.
> An attribution clause, which we are submitting for consideration as a
> standard before OSI, see Attribution Memo.
> Er, one problem: As I pointed out to you during our exchange on
> December 29 (and which observation you acknowledged true), Socialtext
> has NOT "submitted for consideration" to OSI Socialtext Public License's
> Exhibit B "attribution" and "network use" addenda (much less the entire
> modified-MPL licence, as would actually need to occur) -- no more than
> Mr. Asay has ever submitted Alfresco's, no more than Mr. Roberts has
> ever submitted SugarCRM's, etc. You submitted to OSI, as discussed here,
> something entirely different, a licence fragment your firm doesn't
> (thus far) appear to actually use at all, anywhere -- let alone use for
> Socialtext Open.
> Please correct that fundamental misstatement, at your earliest
> opportunity. Thank you.
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
More information about the License-discuss