[Fwd: FW: For Approval: Generic Attribution Provision]
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Mon Jan 22 11:14:09 UTC 2007
Rick Moen wrote:
> I raise that matter for two reasons: (1) I expect that the matter will
> be raised again without the OSD#10 blunder -- indeed, I _hope_ someone
> submits a licence similar to MPL 1.1 + GAP in general outline, but
> without the OSD#10 gaffe, the failure to write coherent English, and
> without GAP's obvious oversight of permitting the original copyright
> holder to mandate _any_ size of "display".
I suspect only one of those is actually a mistake. I'll leave deciding
which as an exercise to the reader.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the License-discuss