Introducing Open Solutions Alliance
Michael Bernstein
webmaven at cox.net
Sat Feb 17 01:21:37 UTC 2007
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:29 -0500, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> Robin 'Roblimo' Miller wrote:
>
> I told two of their
> > people -- and SourceForge.net dude Ross Turk also said -- that we think
> > the membership criterion should be that a company's main products or
> > services are open source, and when we say "open source," we mean open
> > source as defined by OSI.
>
> That's doubly ironic, since SourceForge doesn't seem to have any real
> open source products.
Well, they *do*, technically, it's just that the project has been
unmaintained since 2001:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/alexandria-dev/
But of course there is now more than one open source fork of the
original system available (Gforge, Savannah).
I think that the only OSTG site that continues to maintain and release
on an ongoing basis the current version of the code that they are
running is Slashdot:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/slashcode/
Is this enough to get SourceForge / OSTG / VA Software a pass?
- Michael R. Bernstein
michaelbernstein.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20070216/d3a38d63/attachment.sig>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list