For Approval: GPLv3
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Tue Aug 28 08:17:21 UTC 2007
Chris Travers wrote:
> The question becomes really how much does the GPL require one to do to
*dependant software* licensing
GPL doesn't require anyone to "do" anything to dependent software's
terms. It does require that dependent software's licenses be compatible
, in that those licenses allow sublicensing under GPLv3 (if the licenses
aren't compatible this way, no problem; that just means the software
can't be used with GPLv3 software if that use constitutes derivation
under applicable copyright law).
> THese are not encumbered by the GPL licensor's copyrights and are
> affected by the license in unprecidented ways.
This is not unprecedented. It's almost the same as GPLv2.
More information about the License-discuss