Concerns relating to the FSF and Future Licenses

Chris DiBona cdibona at
Sun Aug 19 03:17:09 UTC 2007

An i'm happy to discuss it, when I'm back from vacation :-) See you
two next week!

On 8/18/07, Rick Moen <rick at> wrote:
> Quoting Chris Travers (chris at
> > For the record, this discussion came about because of questions as to
> > whether similar concerns should be considerd wrt Microsoft.
> Chris di Bona did not seriously suggest anything of the sort.  He merely
> posed a pointed question or two, to any Microsoft Corporation
> representatives as to why OSI should assist them, given numerous
> substantive hostile actions.  The substantive nature, and the hostile
> character, of those actions are far past dispute, which is in both areas
> is considerably more than can be said of your irrelevant and fluffy
> gossip-mongering with which you initially claimed you wished to waste
> our time.
> And you _still_ need to look up "tu quoque".
> > I would note that many people including Rick Moen and Chris Dibona
> > have either asked me to back up what I have said on other threads or
> > offered to discuss it.
> I would note, since you mention that, that you evaded my question, both
> here and in private mail.

Open Source Programs Manager, Google Inc.
Google's Open Source program can be found at
Personal Weblog:

More information about the License-discuss mailing list