Concerns relating to the FSF and Future Licenses

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Chris Travers (chris at metatrontech.com):

> Hi all;

[incredibly long post]

Chris seems to want list-members to conduct an inquiry into FSF itself
and conduct of FSF spokesmen (especially their "loyalty to their ideals"), 
as opposed to examining FSF-originated licences on their merits measured
against, oh, the Open Source Definition.

Speaking for myself, gee, Chris, that just doesn't sound interesting 
(coming across, in fact, as a huge and rather disreputable waste of time),
and I suggest you look up the phrase "tu quoque".