what *is* the approval process?
alexander.terekhov at gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 18:19:15 UTC 2007
On 8/4/07, Luis Villa <luis at tieguy.org> wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Alexander Terekhov <alexander.terekhov at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/3/07, Rick Moen <rick at linuxmafia.com> wrote:
> > > Quoting Dalibor Topic (robilad at kaffe.org):
> > >
> > > > In light or Mr. Terekhov turning this list into gnu.misc.discuss  over the
> > > > past couple of days, and flooding it the way he did with debian-legal, when he
> > > > did his performance act there a little while ago, I'd be interested to know:
> > > >
> > > > what it would take to try one more time, with a vengeance?
> > >
> > > Just as a brief reminder: Killfiles work, too.
> > To those offended and with little killfiling skills: relax, I'm mostly
> > finished now.
> I'm not offended, I'm bored and my time is wasted (as is everyone else's).
> And yes, I'm well aware I have a killfile, but people who know about
> that level of filtering are in the minority. If all you want to have
> on the list is old-skool unix hackers, then 'you have a killfile' is a
> perfectly good response; if OSI wants this list to have a broader and
> more representative composition, then OSI needs to find other
> solutions to the noise problem.
Replied in private.
(600+ thread on gnu.misc.discuss)
More information about the License-discuss