conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review

[David Woolley]

Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:

> This presumes that the clause is severable and not so central
> to the whole GPL that the judge will hold the rest up, but
> that's the theory.

Isn't the purpose of the preamble to make it very clear that this is the 
essence of the licence?
-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.