GPLv3, again Re: what *is* the approval process? [was Re: License Committee Report for July 2007]

Luis Villa luis at
Wed Aug 1 20:08:48 UTC 2007

On 8/1/07, Ernest Prabhakar <ernest.prabhakar at> wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> On Aug 1, 2007, at 7:47 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
> > On re-reading, this was unnecessarily combative in tone; I apologize
> > for that.
> No problem. :-)
> > The offer stands to publish the analysis with appropriate
> > disclaimers, but I do think we'd all be better served if we just
> > skipped the discussion altogether.
> Um, skip *which* discussion? The meta-discussion of whether the
> process is being followed,

That was my initial suggestion, but...

> did you want us to simply "stipulate"
> that the GPLv3 *is* OSD-compliant without further discussion on-list?

... that is what Larry and Rick suggested, and it seems reasonable to me.


More information about the License-discuss mailing list