inconsistency in OSD- software (#2) v. licenses/rights (every other plank)
jesse.hannah at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 07:22:45 UTC 2007
Ah, ok :) I get it now, thanks for clearing that up.
Jesse B Hannah
<jesse.hannah at gmail.com>
<jesse.hannah at asu.edu>
IRC Handle: <jbhannah at irc.freenode.net>
GPG Key: 0xA6DC3EF3
Available from the keyservers or at
On 1 Aug 2007, at 00:00, David Woolley wrote:
> Jesse Hannah wrote:
>> version...it'd probably be better to just say "source code". Other
>> than that, I think those clarifications you suggest are a good idea.
> Source code includes obfuscated source code and the results of
> running pre-processors, like flex and yacc. The preferred form
> wording is intended to ensure that, for example, a parser is
> distributed as the yacc input file, not the resulting C "source
> code" file.
> If it is at all vague, it is done that way to reduce the chances of
> people finding loopholes to allow the "source code" to be
> distributed, but in a way that makes it difficult or impossible for
> the recipient to produce non-trivial modifications.
> David Woolley
> Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
> RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
> that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the License-discuss