conducting a sane and efficient GPLv3, LGPLv3 Review

Alexander Terekhov alexander.terekhov at
Wed Aug 1 05:38:21 UTC 2007

On 8/1/07, Rick Moen <rick at> wrote:
> Quoting Alexander Terekhov (alexander.terekhov at
> > On 8/1/07, Rick Moen <rick at> wrote:
> > > Indeed, I think what you say is abundantly obvious, and doing
> > > anything else would merely waste everyone's time.
> >
> > Yeah, time aside, Google search yields this:
> [snip 150 further lines of some series of rambles about patents,
> collective works, and licence compatibility.]
> No, actually, we're _not_ likely to set aside considerations of avoiding
> time wasteage -- but thank you for the graphical reminder of why.

Speak for yourself, wannabe mafioso.

> Is there even the faintest chance that you have a coherent point, and
> that it might cast even the _dimmest_ light on OSD-compliance?  Or is
> this all just some outrévariant of performance art?

Reread it. And visit also



More information about the License-discuss mailing list