Restriction on distribution by Novell?

[Matthew Flaschen]

David Woolley wrote:>
> I seem to remember that the FSF's lawyer has argued that the clear
> intended spirit of the licence would also be valid input to the
> legal process, and that is one of the reasons for the pre-amble to
> the licence.
> 

The license's preamble may be relevant (since it is still part of the 
license), but I doubt a tangential FAQ would be.

Matthew Flaschen