Restriction on distribution by Novell?

Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen at
Fri Sep 29 05:23:46 UTC 2006

David Woolley wrote:>
> I seem to remember that the FSF's lawyer has argued that the clear
> intended spirit of the licence would also be valid input to the
> legal process, and that is one of the reasons for the pre-amble to
> the licence.

The license's preamble may be relevant (since it is still part of the 
license), but I doubt a tangential FAQ would be.

Matthew Flaschen

More information about the License-discuss mailing list