Redefining GPL?

[Matthew Flaschen]

Rick Moen wrote:

> I'm not sure what they'd do, but it's worth
> mentioning.

I forwarded the original email to the FSF.  I would highly recommend
that Michael release the details, though, at least privately to the FSF
and OSI board.  I think the FSF can deal with it most effectively (since
they have copyright).

> You're right:  This part does seem like something OSI should be
> concerned with.

This is definitely also a path worth pursuing, in my opinion.

Matthew Flaschen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20061130/8c8cec34/attachment.sig>