Free Software Licenses not approved as Open Sourse License
onlineallthetime at gmail.com
Thu Apr 20 22:51:35 UTC 2006
would be great to know where the OSI stands in this regard.
On 4/21/06, Wilson, Andrew <andrew.wilson at intel.com> wrote:
> Laura Majerus wrote:
> > Recently, someone had asked whether interested parties who are not
> > stewards of the license can submit licenses for approval by OSI and
> > answer at the time was "no." OSI only approves licenses that are
> > submitted for approval by their stewards.
> We should have this discussion sooner or later, so let's try sooner.
> As everyone knows, FSF is in the process of revising GPL and LGPL.
> Also, everyone knows Richard Stallman's opinion of "open source"
> versus "free software." I wouldn't dream of presuming to speak
> for Richard and the FSF, but I would be very surprised if they
> were to submit GPL/LGPL 3.0 to OSI for approval as "open source."
> If this assumption is correct, and if OSI strictly enforces the
> stewards-only policy Laura describes, that creates a highly awkward
> situation where two of the most important licenses
> wouldn't even be evaluated.
> Seemingly, something needs to give.
> Andy Wilson
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the License-discuss