For Approfal: OSL 3.0 and AFL 3.0
nelson at crynwr.com
Wed Sep 14 04:34:32 UTC 2005
Chuck Swiger writes:
> Mandating a clear, standard Subject line when people submit a
> license for consideration is quite reasonable. Deciding that the
> Subject header of "Submitted for Approval: " is too different from
> "For Approval: " for the license proposal to receive consideration
> without being reposted is taking the bureaucratic mindset past the
> bounds of common sense.
Are you offering to write the license approval committee report?
If you're not, then don't suggest that I should have to work harder to
If you are, great! We love volunteers.
--my blog is at blog.russnelson.com | with some experience
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | you know what to do.
521 Pleasant Falley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 | with more experience
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog | you know what not to do.
More information about the License-discuss