License Proliferation Committee Response
dbarrett at quinthar.com
Tue Sep 6 02:31:08 UTC 2005
Thanks for the clarifications, Laura.
So it seems to me that the dependency between license approval and
license proliferation hasn't yet been decided. On one extreme, licenses
should be approved irrespective of proliferation concerns. At the other
extreme, few to no more licenses should ever be approved. And there are
many, many positions in between. But no matter what the position
eventually decided, it will likely change the approval process in some way.
My question is:
1) Should outstanding license approval applications be "grandfathered
in" and considered only on the basis of the process under which they
were originally submitted?
2) Alternatively, should those applications be considered under an
3) Alternatively, should all applications be delayed indefinitely until
a new process has been defined?
Has anyone any preference?
More information about the License-discuss