chris at czv.com
Mon Sep 5 09:36:18 UTC 2005
On Sep 5, 2005, at 11:03 AM, Alex Bligh wrote:
> --On 04 September 2005 22:42 -0700 Ben Tilly <btilly at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I hate using the word "compatible" there.
>> One would think that "compatible" indicated a reciprocal relationship.
>> It does not. "GPL compatible" means that you can be incorporated
>> into GPLed software. You generally can't incorporate GPLed software
>> into anything that isn't GPLed. The limit of compatibility is a
>> one-directional relationship.
> OK, well that makes 2 of us. Shall we invent the phrases
> "MPL-relicensable" etc. as that is (I think) what we are really talking
How about GPL-vulnerable?
Just kidding ;-)
More information about the License-discuss