Change ot topic, back to OVPL
Alex Bligh
alex at alex.org.uk
Tue Aug 30 08:20:25 UTC 2005
--On 29 August 2005 23:28 -0700 David Barrett <dbarrett at quinthar.com> wrote:
> Ah, that's interesting. Will you be supplying a blurb of justification
> for why a license has been assigned a particular tier, or perhaps a blurb
> summarizing the reasons a license might be on a particular tier?
>
> For example, if all new licenses are assigned to "not recommended", it
> would be nice to distinguish between those that are there because they're
> untried, versus there because they were tried and found lacking.
It would also be useful to document license failings (to put people off
using them, or repeating the errors elsewhere). For instance
* Jurisdiction specific
* Not templated
* BSD-advertising clause problem
* The following terms are not well defined (etc.)
Alex
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list