Copy-Back License draft for discussion
tg at 66h.42h.de
Mon Apr 25 06:22:59 UTC 2005
John Cowan dixit:
>About the most that the FLOSS community will accept is a requirement to
>publicize the change on a web page, not to actively mail it back to you.
It's not DFSG-free.
I'd suggest a requirement to grant back rights to the original
developer in addition to a (Carnegie-Mellon style) suggestion
to send it back. Think dictator on an island with a solar powered laptop.
PS: Look at http://mirbsd.mirsolutions.de/man8/raidctl.htm
for an example (scroll to the bottom, it's part of the
More information about the License-discuss