Copy-Back License draft for discussion

[Thorsten Glaser]

John Cowan dixit:

>About the most that the FLOSS community will accept is a requirement to
>publicize the change on a web page, not to actively mail it back to you.

It's not DFSG-free.

I'd suggest a requirement to grant back rights to the original
developer in addition to a (Carnegie-Mellon style) suggestion
to send it back. Think dictator on an island with a solar powered laptop.

bye,
//mirabile

PS: Look at http://mirbsd.mirsolutions.de/man8/raidctl.htm
    for an example (scroll to the bottom, it's part of the
    licence).