Mistaken statement about MPL?
andrew.wilson at intel.com
Tue Apr 12 20:17:14 UTC 2005
Bruce Perens wrote:
> IMO, this was meant as a criticism of the NPL, not MPL. It's really
> to get them confused. If that's the case, we should clear it up and
Text as currently posted on the OSI site reads:
"We think it is is significant that the original corporate open-source
the Mozilla Public License, has been dropped by its originating
in favor of the GPL. It is becoming increasingly clear from this and
that the "middle way" represented by Mozilla and other corporate
is not a stable, effective solution even from the point of view of
selfish corporate agents."
This talks about many things, but not specifically NPL.
Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the License-discuss