Official License Anti-Proliferation policy?
codykoeninger at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 12 02:49:47 UTC 2005
> * From now on, approved licenses must meet three new
> criteria of being (a) non-duplicative, (b) clear
> and understandable . . .
Does that mean the GPL is soon to be on the
'deprecated' list? Seriously, this is not intended as
a troll. I'd find it hard to call the GPL either
clear and understandable, or technically correct.
Would a clear, technically correct rewrite of the GPL
be "duplicative"? If so, isnt the Board's statement
foreclosing the possiblity of real improvement on the
issue of satisfying both 'suits' and 'hackers'?
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
More information about the License-discuss