"viral" (was RE: Licensing options for firmware)
rick at linuxmafia.com
Thu Apr 7 06:01:09 UTC 2005
Quoting Benjamin Rossen (b.rossen at onsnet.nu):
> Yes, but that reference is about English.
FWIW, it also covers the Latin usage. You really should read
Christiansen's piece: It's about as comprehensive a treatment of the
question as you'll find.
> The relevant point is this: we generally understand virus by its
> English meaning to be an infective agent that replicates itself. This
> is not a useful analogy for a license. It is for software when the
> software is an agent of infection (which is exactly why it is used for
> computer viruses) but not for the kinds of software we find arising
> from Open Source Projects that have licenses. These do not infect. We
More information about the License-discuss