For Approval: Open Project Public License (OPPL)

[Larry Masters]

Alex,

Under section 5 the user would be able to use the editor if the editor 
was legally created or obtained. At least this is what I would think.

May have to put this back on the drawing board. Basically what we are 
wanting to do with the license is "control" code created to work with 
the licensed software, control meaning that any software created to work 
with it must be released under the same license and source code made 
avaiable.

Larry E. Masters

Alex Rousskov wrote:

>The hypothetical editor in question has nothing to do with Software.
>It does not use Software. Its author is unaware of the Software.
>However, Item 1 quoted below is so broad that, it seems to me,
>distributing said text editor would "signify acceptance of this
>license" because the editor may interact with Software in some
>environments. For example, a user may use the editor to edit Software.
>
>Would distributing the editor signify acceptance of the license?
>
>Alex.
>
>  
>
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3