Dual licensing
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
rdixon at cyberspaces.org
Sun Jun 6 20:25:00 UTC 2004
I agree with the point that the creative spark is not communitarian. My
point -- if we are to use Eric Raymond's book as an example (see Raymond's
busness model "8 Free the Software, Sell the Brand") -- is that dual
licensing IS an authentic open source model.
- Rod
---------
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
rdixon at cyberspaces.org
www.cyberspaces.org
...... Original Message .......
On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:16:44 -0400 John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> wrote:
>Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. scripsit:
>
>> Open source software refers to a development model as well as a software
>> licensing legal regime.
>
>Maybe in the press it does, but on the ground it does not. Only a small
>fraction of the projects on Sourceforge or announced at Freshmeat are
>developed in bazaar fashion. (Note that in TCATB, Eric uses "cathedral"
>to refer to a certain kind of open source software, not to closed source
>software.)
>
>The small one-person efforts may be more huts than cathedrals, but that
>does not mean they are developed by an unconventional development model.
>
>--
>John Cowan
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list