nelson at crynwr.com
Wed Feb 25 15:40:39 UTC 2004
Tony Linde writes:
> Thanks for that, Russell. The AFL certainly looks simpler than the CPL (or
> derivative Lucent PL). It doesn't specifically refer to the right to
> commercially distribute the code or any derivative code without being
> obliged to provide any source code. Is this, and similar, rights implicit in
> their omission from the text?
The license does not distinguish between commercial distributions or
derivatives. It obligates no one to distribute source code.
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com | Coding in Python
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | is like
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | sucking on sugar.
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | FWD# 404529 via VOIP | Sweet!
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss