Open Test License v1.1 rejection

jcowan at jcowan at
Wed Feb 18 21:46:00 UTC 2004

Alex Rousskov scripsit:

> Assuming I did not, let me replace "derived products" with "derived
> works" since "product" is difficult to define. I will also explicitly
> include "published test results" in the derived works. A published
> test result is a derived work, right?

No, at least generally not.  When you compile a program with the GPL-licensed
GCC, the resulting binary is not a derivative work of GCC.  You are still
trying to make a copyright-based license do the work of a trademark, and
it just won't.

I marvel at the creature: so secret and         John Cowan
so sly as he is, to come sporting in the pool   jcowan at
before our very window.  Does he think that
Men sleep without watch all night?  --Faramir
license-discuss archive is at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list