pruning "dead" licenses
Russell Nelson
nelson at crynwr.com
Tue Dec 14 19:54:40 UTC 2004
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> That's pretty insane - after all, the OSD defines an open source licence,
> while the "OSI certified Open Source software" mark does not apply to
> licences but to software ...
What purpose does a license serve if nobody uses it?
> > > Russell Nelson wrote:
> > >
> > > > certification mark. I think that one thing we should immediately do
> > > > is say "You MUST link to our copy of the certification mark; all other
> > > > use is prohibited. You MUST send us a copy of any use of the
> > > > certification mark in print; all other use is prohibited."
>
> You sure you work for OSI?
Yes. The essence of a trademark is tight-fisted control. If you
don't have that control, you don't have a trademark.
--
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com | Freedom means allowing
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | people to do things the
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-323-1241 cell | majority thinks are
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 212-202-2318 VOIP | stupid, e.g. take drugs.
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list