Affero GPL 2(d)
Michael Bernstein
webmaven at cox.net
Fri Aug 13 16:41:13 UTC 2004
Eben Moglen wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Henri has reminded me of an overdue obligation to respond to
> discussion of the Affero GPL as a potential candidate for OSI
> approval.
Eben, Thank you for joining into this discussion.
> Our current projected 2(d) for use in a modified Affero GPL or other
> similar license is:
>
> d) If the Program as you received it is intended to interact with
> users through a computer network and if, in the version you received,
> any user interacting with the Program was given the opportunity to
> request transmission to that user of the Program's complete source
> code, you must not remove that facility from your modified version of
> the Program or work based on the Program, and must offer an
> equivalent opportunity for all users interacting with your Program
> through a computer network to request immediate transmission of the
> complete source code of your modified version or other derivative
> work by the same communication protocol used for other user
> interaction with the Program.
I think this draft largely solves the technological neutrality issue,
but I have two nitpicks left:
> For clarity's sake, however, one would meet this objection in
> amending the license text, by s/request immediate/request and receive
> immediate/. I see no legal risk that would be created by the addition
> of those words.
Is the word 'immediate' required? Some applications used over a network
can have delayed responses.
> "by the same communication protocol used for other user interaction
> with the Program."
Is this necessary? It would prohibit placing an ftp:// link within an
HTML web application interface, not to mention any number of other
combinations (an http:// link within an email, for example).
--
- Michael R. Bernstein | Author of Zope Bible
michaelbernstein.com | & Zope.org Webmaster
panhedron.com | PythonPhotos.org
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list