For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
sean at chittenden.org
Sat Sep 27 17:01:14 UTC 2003
> > I know that, but I want people to take bits and make them
> > proprietary. More correctly. In my own context, I want to be
> > able to use the fruits of my labor. The contributions that I seek
> > are from other widget makers using the same tool for their widget.
> In that case, a "community" style license may be more appropriate.
> For example Netscape uses (used?) this. All modified releases are to
> be publicly available (much like the GPL), but furthermore everyone
> who is not Sean Chittenden has to license his modifications to Sean
> under arbitrary terms. This allows Sean to do whatever he wants, for
> example selling the modifications.
Under the OSSAL, there is no central organization, like there is with
the MPL. The OSSAL is much more distributed than the MPL, which is
why I like it more than the MPL.
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss